Skip to Main Content

Safety Performance Measures – 673.11(a)(3)

The PTASP Final Rule, 49 CFR Part 673.11(a)(3), requires that all public transportation providers must develop an ASP to include SPTs based on the safety performance measures established under the NSP. The safety performance measures outlined in the NSP were developed to ensure that the measures can be applied to all modes of public transportation and are based on data currently being submitted to the NTD. The safety performance measures included in the NSP are fatalities, injuries, safety events, and system reliability (State of Good Repair as developed and tracked in the TAM Plan).

There are seven (7) SPTs that must be included in each ASP that are based on the four (4) performance measures in the NSP. These SPTs are presented in terms of total numbers reported and rate per Vehicle Revenue Mile (VRM). Each of the seven (7) are required to be reported by mode as presented in Table 4.

Table 4: NSP Safety Performance Measures

Safety Performance Measures: Fatalities
SPT: Total Number Reported
SPT: Rate Per Total VRM

Safety Performance Measures: Injuries
SPT: Total Number Reported
SPT: Rate Per Total VRM

Safety Performance Measures: Safety Events
SPT: Total Number Reported
SPT: Rate Per Total VRM

Safety Performance Measures: System Reliability
SPT: Mean distance between major mechanical failure

Table 4 NSP Safety Performance Measures. All information on this table is listed above.

Table 5 presents baseline numbers for each of the performance measures. PBT collected the past four (4) years of reported data to develop the rolling averages listed in the table.

Table 5: Baseline 2019 Safety Performance Measures

Mode: Fixed Route (Bus)
Fatalities: 0.0
Rate of Fatalities*: 0%
Injuries: 5.0
Rate of Injuries*: 0.00841%
Safety Events: 5.0
Rate of Safety Events*: 0.00841%
Mean Distance Between Major Mechanical Failure: 18,344

Mode: Demand Response
Fatalities: 0.0
Rate of Fatalities*: 0%
Injuries: 0.0
Rate of Injuries*: 0%
Safety Events: 0.0
Rate of Safety Events*: 0%
Mean Distance Between Major Mechanical Failure: 59,436

*rate = total number for the year/total revenue vehicle miles traveled

Table 5 Baseline 2019 Safety Performance Measures. All information on this table is listed above.

While safety has always been a major component of the PBT operation, the adoption of this ASP will result in changes across all aspects of the organization. The SPTs set in Table 6 and Table 7 reflect an acknowledgement that SMS implementation will produce new information that will be needed to accurately set meaningful SPTs. We will set our targets at the current NTD-reported four-year average as we begin the process of fully implementing our SMS and developing our targeted safety improvements. This will ensure that we do no worse than our baseline performance over the last four years.

Table 6: Fixed Route (Bus) Safety Performance Targets

Mode: Fatalities
Baseline: 0
Target: 0

Mode: Rate of Fatalities*
Baseline: 0%
Target: 0%

Mode: Injuries
Baseline: 1.3
Target: 1.3

Mode: Rate of Injuries*
Baseline: 0.00064%
Target: 0.00064%

Mode: Safety Events
Baseline: 2.5
Target: 2.5

Mode: Rate of Safety Events*
Baseline: 0.00129%
Target: 0.00129%

Mode: Mean Distance Between Major Mechanical Failure
Baseline: 24,244
Target: 24,244

*rate = total number for the year/total revenue vehicle miles traveled

Table 6 Fixed Route (Bus) Safety Performance Targets. All information on this table is listed above.

Table 7: Demand Response Safety Performance Targets

Mode: Fatalities
Baseline: 0
Target: 0

Mode: Rate of Fatalities*
Baseline: 0%
Target: 0%

Mode: Injuries
Baseline: 0
Target: 0

Mode: Rate of Injuries*
Baseline: 0%
Target: 0%

Mode: Safety Events
Baseline: 0
Target: 0

Mode: Rate of Safety Events*
Baseline: 0%
Target: 0%

Mode: Mean Distance Between Major Mechanical Failure
Baseline: 27,748
Target: 27,748

Mode: Other
Baseline: N/A
Target: N/A

*rate = total number for the year/total revenue vehicle miles traveled

Table 7 Demand Response Safety Performance Targets. All information on this table is listed above.

As part of the annual review of the ASP, PBT will reevaluate our SPTs and determine whether the SPTs need to be refined. As more data is collected as part of the SRM process discussed later in this plan, PBT may begin developing safety performance indicators to help inform management on safety-related investments.

Back to Table of Contents